•   Posted in:
  • .NET

And just for perspective, we have 824 C# projects and when someone thinks about converting, they may believe that they need to convert all these projects to support .NET X (where X >= 5), change the build system, etc.

It turns out that there is an easy way to do and it allows us to do proof of concept very quickly and then test compatibility. And to do this you need to do nothing. Yep, you heard me right. Our application is a native application that loads .NET Framework runtime and then loads .NET Framework assemblies.

It turns out that all we need to do is to change the .NET Framework loader to load .NET 6 runtime. It is described

Previous part is here. This post will explain, how to restart your web site at specific intervals without returning errors to clients. You can scroll to solution, if you are no interested in my thoughts and to see what I try.

Thoughts and research

As I mentioned in this post, I decided to restart my web site periodically to avoid out of memory issue. And I would like to mention that it wasn’t easy to do. Obviously, restarting web site is super simple and all you need is to restart its service. But that means that your web site will be unavailable for some time. Depending on size of the web site, we are talking about seconds or

Some time ago, I wrote series of posts on how to run .NET Core app on AWS Lightsail Linux instance. Everything worked nice but sometimes, about once per month my web site stopped responding. And I cannot connect to my instance at all to diagnose that issue. All I can do is just restart my AWS instance. At the beginning I thought it could be AWS issue, or perhaps some issues in .NET. I updated everything I can, but problem persists. And when it happened last time, I decided to check kernel logs and I found this:

Feb 10 07:31:18 ip-1-2-3-4 kernel: [1512878.216567] oom-kill:constraint=CONSTRAINT_NONE,nodemask=(null),cpuset=/,mems_allowed=0,global_oom,task_memcg=/system.slice/www.example.com.service,task=dotnet,pid=511,uid=1001
Feb 10 07:31:18 ip-1-2-3-4 kernel: [1512878.216597] Out of memory: Killed process 511 (dotnet) total-vm:3007440kB, anon-rss:105260kB, file-rss:0kB, shmem-rss:0kB, UID:1001 pgtables:712kB oom_score_adj:0
Feb 10 07:31:18 ip-1-2-3-4 kernel: [1512878.241642] oom_reaper: reaped process 511 (dotnet), now anon-rss:0kB, file-rss:0kB, shmem-rss:0kB

  •   Posted in:
  • .NET

Recently I was asked to check why one of our applications crashes when it calls CreateNamedPipe function. Everything works fine in the x64 version, but the x86 version crashes. There are no differences in the code between x86 and x64 and they compiled the same.

Let’s see how CreateNamedPipe defined in our code:

[DllImport("kernel32.dll", SetLastError = true, CharSet = CharSet.Unicode)]
static extern SafePipeHandle CreateNamedPipe(string lpName, uint dwOpenMode,
    uint dwPipeMode, uint nMaxInstances, uint nOutBufferSize, uint nInBufferSize,
    uint nDefaultTimeOut, SECURITY_ATTRIBUTES securityAttributes);

and here is how it called:

SafePipeHandle safeHandle = CreateNamedPipe(
                cPipeAccessDuplex |
                cPipeTypeMessage |
                nOutBufferSize: 0,
                nInBufferSize: 0,

Everything looks correct. I checked flags, compared them with

Previous part is here.

I found that I was missed one critical part that I did in my application but forgot to explain here. Let me explain little bit. Effectively secure communication via HTTPS protocol happens between browser and nginx that is web server. Nginx communicates with .NET application via HTTP protocol. And effectively .NET application believes that it is communicating via HTTP. It called SSL termination.

And as result .NET application can return something that is not compatible with HTTPS protocol. In my case it returns link to profile from Gravatar service via HTTP. This in turn leads to complain from web browser that there is mixed content: HTTP and HTTPS. And that one only minor problem but

This is continuation of Running .NET Core app on AWS Lightsail Linux instance.

By this moment everything is working exactly as I want. But I have 2 things that really annoys me: backup and updating web site. Because I revoked access to web site directory for every account except www.example.com I have to run a lot of commands from sudo user to backup and update my web site. I would like to automate these steps.


I have 2 things to backup: web site itself and its data. I separate them because they have different update schedule. For example, I can update web site few times per day and then did not update it for weeks. Obviously, I

This is continuation of Running .NET Core app on AWS Lightsail Linux instance.

One of the useful features I always use for .NET and .NET Core application in IIS is special file app_offline.htm. If this found exist in application’s directory, then .NET module for IIS will return contents of that file for every request. Usually, it used for maintenance. For example, I put some text that web site is under maintenance and that it will be finished in few minutes. Then I am updating all necessary files that are impossible to update while web site is running. When I finished, I will rename it to app_offline.hml_ until next maintenance.

I found like to implement something

Previous part is here.


Firstly, you need domain name. “You can purchase a domain name from Namecheap, get one for free with Freenom, or use the domain registrar of your choice”. Then follow instructions on how to setup A record. Because you have static IP it will be really easy to do. For example from Namecheap instructions are here.

Keep in mind that it could take up to 24 hours to propagate changes. But if you never accessed your domain before, then it should work in few minutes. Remove your changes from hosts file on your computer and when changes are propagated, you should be able to refresh your browser and see your site with

Previous part is here.

Web service

Next step will be to run dotnet application in service that starts with your virtual PC and system will restart it if application crashes. We will create specific user (www.example.com) that will run dotnet application. Why do we need specific user? Answer is quite simple – security.

Let me elaborate on that. Nginx is running from specific user (www-data). Service will run from another user that we will create (www.example.com). Surely you can run everything from root account, but if nginx or dotnet has some vulnerability then hacker will get access to whole system. If each service has own quite limited account that not even able to login. Moreover,